A Comparative and Exegetical Study of Selected Urdu Translations of Sūrat al-Kahafʾ: Lexical Meaning and the Determination of Divine Intent
سورۂ الکہف کی منتخب آیات کے اردو تراجم کا تقابلی و تفسیری مطالعہ: الفاظ، مفاہیم اور مقصودِ الٰہی کے تعین کے تناظر میں
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/Keywords:
Sūrat al-Kahf, Urdu Qurʾan translation, comparative translation, Qurʾanic semantics, tafsīr, lexical analysis, Kanz al-Īmān, Aḥsan al-Bayān, Maʿārif al-QurʾānAbstract
This article critically examines selected lexical and syntactic expressions from Sūrat al-Kahf in three influential Urdu renderings associated with Kanz al-Īmān, Aḥsan al-Bayān, and Maʿārif al-Qurʾān. It explores how far each translator’s lexical and contextual choices preserve the semantic range, rhetorical force, and exegetical implications of the Arabic source text. The study adopts a qualitative comparative method: each Urdu rendering is first examined in light of the immediate Qurʾanic context, Arabic morphology, and syntactic structure; it is then evaluated through major classical commentaries and exegetical sources, including al-Ṭabarī, al-Baghawī, al-Jalālayn, al-Bayḍāwī, Ibn Kathīr, Ibn al-Jawzī, Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, Ibn Abī Ḥātim, ʿAbd al-Razzāq, and Ibn ʿUthaymīn. The analysis demonstrates that no single Urdu translation is uniformly superior in every instance. A close rendering may preserve the lexical meaning more precisely, whereas an idiomatic or explanatory rendering may communicate the contextual sense more effectively. The expressions bākhiʿ, al-kahf wa al-raqīm, shataṭan, rajman bi-l-ghayb, surādiquhā, khilālahumā, yuḥāwiruhu, qubulan, lā abraḥu, nukran, and ruḥman particularly illustrate the semantic complexity involved in translating Qurʾanic vocabulary and the need to distinguish lexical equivalence from exegetical adequacy. The study therefore argues for a context-sensitive approach to Qurʾanic translation in which the main Urdu rendering remains concise and faithful to the Arabic expression, while a brief explanatory note may be employed where the lexical or exegetical tradition contains more than one defensible interpretation. Such an approach can better convey the linguistic density and interpretive plurality of the Qurʾanic text while maintaining clarity for Urdu readers.
Keywords: Sūrat al-Kahf; Urdu Qurʾan translation; comparative translation; Qurʾanic semantics; tafsīr; lexical analysis; Kanz al-Īmān; Aḥsan al-Bayān; Maʿārif al-Qurʾān
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
